Back to Main
Interview Guides
Microsoft
Get Premium
Meta M1 (Manager) Interview Guide
A comprehensive guide to the Meta manager interview process.
Meta's M1 engineering manager interview has 7 rounds after your recruiter screen. You'll have 2 screening rounds (behavioral and design). If you pass those, your onsite will have five interviews covering people management, project retrospective, a general behavioral round, a design round (either System Design or Product Architecture), and one coding interview. The process usually takes 4 to 8 weeks from start to offer but recruiters are typically able to accommodate much faster timelines if they have reason to (e.g. competitive offers). Scheduling and hiring committee approval can extend this timeline, especially for follow up interviews which are common.
M1 interviews challenge you on two fronts: technical depth and management skills. M1 candidates must prove they can scale their impact through others while maintaining enough technical credibility to guide architecture and earn respect from senior engineers. For design interviews, this typically means you're on par with an E5 (senior) engineer. For coding interviews, a lot of grace is extended with a "rusty coder" evaluation.
Your leadership rounds will make or break you. The people management and behavioral interviews can kill your chances no matter how well you code. The project retrospective rounds are unique to manager interviews, where you'll dissect the same project from an execution angle to show you can lead people and drive impact.
Meta's interviewers are trained to try to de-bias the candidates' environment from their core skillset and values (e.g. if you work in a company with a very different culture/style). Still, it can be useful to understand the company's general leadership style to help translate your experience into a language that resonates with your interviewer.
The interview consists of 7 total rounds:
- Recruiter Screen
- Behavioral Screen
- Design Screen
- Onsite (Usually virtual)
- People Management
- Project Retrospective
- Behavioral
- System Design or Product Architecture
- Coding
If you pass, you'll move onto team match and finally, offer negotiation.
Interview Rounds
Onsite
People Management Interview
Meta tests whether you can handle the human side of engineering leadership in the People Management interview. This behavioral round focuses on your experience managing engineers and often makes or breaks M1 candidates. You'll discuss performance management, difficult feedback, team conflicts, and tough personnel decisions.
Your interviewer will probe deeply into specific situations from your past. They want real stories so be sure you're able to authentically relay your experience. They want to hear about the time you fired someone, how you handled an underperforming team member, or what you did when two engineers couldn't work together. The questions frequently follow a "Tell me about a time when" pattern with specific follow ups about your decisions and outcomes but periodically will veer more hypothetical or abstract like "what's your management philosophy?"
You're evaluated on four main aspects:
- Performance Management: Your ability to manage your team's performance and hold people accountable. This includes setting clear expectations, providing constructive feedback, and making hiring and firing decisions.
- Growth and Mentorship: Your ability to develop and support your team members. This often includes promotions, but standout managers showcase their ability to level-up their team outside of formal cycles.
- Recruiting: Your ability to hire and onboard new team members. This includes sourcing, screening, and interviewing candidates.
- Cross-Functional and Collaboration: Your ability to work effectively with other teams and stakeholders. This includes navigating conflicts, building consensus, and driving alignment.
For example, they might ask how you'd handle a senior engineer who's technically strong but consistently misses deadlines, or what you'd do if a team member complains about another team member's behavior.
"Interviewers all have had checklist items to test you against and [time pressure was intense] ... to complete the questions within a 45mins loop interview"
— Recent Meta M1 candidate
Prepare 4 to 5 detailed stories that showcase different aspects of people management. You need examples of difficult conversations, performance management situations, team building successes, and times when you made unpopular but necessary decisions. For each story, explain what happened, why you chose your approach, how you communicated with the people involved, and what the outcomes were.
This interview carries enormous weight in the final decision.
"The more you're able to shift your mindset from "I can't screw this up" to "this is a great challenge for me to learn from and maybe get a better job", the better your overall performance will be during the interviews"
— Recent Meta M1 candidate
Meta wants engineering managers who can build strong, productive teams while maintaining high performance standards. Your technical skills might get you to the final round, but your people management capabilities determine whether you get the offer.
Live, up-to-date
Most commonly asked People Management questions
Meta
Manager
Behavioral Interview
The Behavioral interview, unlike the project retrospective and people management interviews, is about you as an individual. While managers work through their teams, this round is open-ended and more focused on your motivations, how you can deliver value, how you handle ambiguity, and how you've demonstrated leadership in the past.
Expect questions about times when you disagreed with a peer manager, managed competing priorities from different stakeholders, or built consensus around an unpopular technical vision. Expect to spend significant time discussing what you are most proud of. The interviewer will probe your approach, communication strategy, and how you measured success.
Interviewers are focused on a few key areas:
- Impact: Your ability to influence and lead others to deliver significant impact on the business.
- Collaboration and Conflict: Your ability to navigate difficult interpersonal situations, mentor individuals through challenges, and handle underperformance with both empathy and decisiveness.
- Ambiguity: Your ability to operate effectively in ambiguous situations, make decisions, and sustain high levels of productivity despite missing information or lack of clarity.
- Motivation: A gut check on whether you care about people, technical challenges, and the impact of your work.
- Growth: Your ability to solicit feedback, learn from it, and grow as a leader (especially outside formal performance processes).
To get ready for this interview, prepare stories that cover the key areas above. Favor situations that get below the surface.
"Handling inclusivity was something I was not prepared for. [My] company has DEI policies in place but nothing that I had to handle on my team."
— Recent Meta M1 candidate
Live, up-to-date
Most commonly asked Behavioral questions
Meta
Manager
1. Can you share an example where you resolved a significant conflict between different teams or departments in your organization?
2. Tell me about a time you had a conflict with a coworker. How did you resolve it?
3. Can you describe a time when you had to make a decision with incomplete information? What was the situation, and how did you handle it?
4. Give me an example of a tough or critical piece of feedback you received.
5. What project are you most proud of?
Project Retrospective
The Project Retrospective interview tests your ability to execute and lead complex engineering projects from a management perspective. You'll walk through how you planned, executed, and delivered a significant project while the interviewer probes your decision making process, stakeholder management, and leadership approach.
This interview varies depending on the interviewer and we see a couple variations with equal likelihood. Either:
a) You'll walk through one project end to end, from initial business context and requirements through planning, execution, and outcomes. The interviewer will ask specific follow up questions about your decisions, how you handled challenges, and what you'd do differently.
b) You'll be asked a series of "tell me about a time when" questions covering the same ground.
"Project retrospective could be a single project deep dive or a general project management questions."
— Recent Meta M1 candidate
Interviewers are evaluating your approach to execution, its alignment with Meta's values and styles, and building a mental model of how to credit the success of the project to you. Expect to cover logistics like:
- Goal Setting: How you set goals and expectations for the project. How does that connect to your team/org/company priorities and business?
- Roadmapping and Planning: How you broke down the project into smaller milestones and how you tracked progress.
- Stakeholder Management: How you identified and managed all stakeholders, negotiated requirements or changes, and kept everyone aligned throughout the project.
- Execution: How you managed the project, including how you set timelines and resources, and ensured completion to requirements.
- Communication: How you communicated with stakeholders, including how you handled difficult conversations and kept everyone aligned.
- Learning and Improvement: How you learned from the project and how you'd do it differently next time.
Prepare one substantial project you can discuss in exhaustive detail. Explain what happened, why you chose specific approaches, how you communicated with stakeholders, and what the outcomes were. The interviewer will circle back to earlier parts of your story, so consistency and depth of knowledge are crucial.
System Design or Product Architecture Interview (1 round)
This 45 minute interview is important to show that you have the technical skills to lead an engineering team. You'll get to choose between System Design or Product Architecture. Both use Excalidraw as the standard whiteboarding tool, so practice with this platform beforehand. You'll be evaluated against E5 (Senior) engineer expectations and there's really no affordances granted to managers to be rusty here: the expectation is that this is a regular part of your job.
"40 minutes for System Design is tight on time. There is not a lot of room for meandering/thinking through the problem. Even if the problem is not in your domain."
— Recent Meta M1 candidate
There's significant confusion about these two interview types, even within Meta itself. Many interviewers don't fully understand the distinction, and you might get similar questions in both formats. Here's what actually happens.
Product Architecture
Product Architecture is almost always a user facing product question. You'll design systems like Ticketmaster, Uber, Instagram, or Facebook News Feed. Complete products that users directly interact with. The focus is more on API design, user experience flows, data modeling, and client server interactions but you'll still design the full backend of the system in the majority of cases.
The exception to this which we see in about 20% of cases is that you're instead asked to design an API or a low-level design problem like designing the newsfeed API or a localization system.
Live, up-to-date
Most commonly asked Product Architecture questions
Meta
Manager
System Design
System Design can go either way. In theory, System Design focuses more on infrastructure and backend components like distributed caches, rate limiters, ad click aggregators, or data pipelines. But in reality, you'll often get asked to design user facing products too. The difference is that when you get a user facing product in System Design, the discussion tends to focus more on the backend architecture, scalability challenges, database design, and system internals rather than user experience flows.
"During system design interview, you should drive the conversation and keep the feedback loop to the minimum. Obviously ask for feedback after Functional requirements to contain the scope of the problem, but drive the high level design and deep dive by yourself. Talk about trade offs while designing key components instead of waiting for the interviewer to ask questions."
— Recent Meta M1 candidate
Live, up-to-date
Most commonly asked System Design questions
Meta
Manager
Both interview types evaluate the same four competencies: problem navigation, solution design, technical excellence, and technical communication. The main practical differences are around team matching. Product Architecture interviews are for "SWE, Product" (fullstack engineer) positions, while System Design interviews are for "SWE, Infrastructure" (backend engineer) positions. You'll typically be matched with teams that have engineers of the corresponding mix.
The competency breakdown is as follows.
- Problem Navigation: Effectively identifies and understands the core challenges and requirements of a system. Prioritizes and focuses on the most critical aspects of the problem.
- Solution Design: Crafts scalable, efficient, and robust system architectures. Balances trade offs between performance, scalability, maintainability, and cost.
- Technical Excellence: Demonstrates a deep understanding of various technologies, tools, and best practices. Stays updated with the latest trends and innovations in system design.
- Technical Communication: Clearly and effectively communicates design decisions, trade offs, and the rationale behind them. Can explain complex technical concepts in a way that is accessible to both technical and non technical stakeholders.
This choice affects team matching since different teams look for different skill sets. If you get a user facing product question in System Design, expect deeper technical discussions about scalability, database sharding, caching strategies, and handling millions of concurrent users. If you get the same question in Product Architecture, expect more focus on API design, user workflows, and feature implementation.
For more details on the differences and which to choose, read our comprehensive guide.
Coding Interview
The Coding interview tests whether you can still write solid code as an engineering manager. You'll solve 1 to 2 algorithmic problems in CoderPad while proving you haven't lost your technical edge. This is crucial for earning respect from the engineers you'll manage. Managers are evaluated against a "rusty coder" standard which is effectively similar to a mid-level (E4) engineer with the assumption that your syntax and ability to hammer out code quickly is not as good as it used to be.
The problems you'll face are typically LeetCode medium difficulty, focusing on fundamental data structures and algorithms. Expect questions involving array manipulation, tree traversals, and graph algorithms. Dynamic programming questions are discouraged, as well as any question which requires a huge leap of logic. The company wants to focus on your ability to solve real coding problems, not riddles. The interviewer isn't looking for perfect, production ready code, but they want to see that you can think through a problem systematically and implement a working solution without getting stuck on basic syntax or algorithmic concepts.
Your interviewer knows you might not be coding daily anymore, so they care more about your problem solving approach and technical communication than perfect syntax recall. You still need to produce correct, runnable code that demonstrates solid algorithmic thinking.
You're evaluated on three main aspects:
- Problem solving & algorithms: Your ability to understand the problem, identify the right approach, and handle edge cases. Interviewers want to see logical thinking and appropriate use of data structures and algorithms.
- Coding implementation: How well you translate your solution into correct, clean code. This includes writing syntactically correct code and structuring it clearly without relying on IDE assistance.
- Communication clarity: How effectively you explain your thinking process, ask clarifying questions, and walk through your solution. This is especially important for managers since it demonstrates how you'd collaborate with your team.
Get back into coding practice if you've been away from it. Spend time solving medium level problems on platforms like LeetCode, but practice in a plain text editor rather than an IDE to simulate the interview environment. Focus on explaining your approach out loud before you start coding. This habit will serve you well when you need to articulate your thought process during the actual interview.
Live, up-to-date
Most commonly asked Coding questions
Meta
Manager
What to Expect
Based on feedback from candidates who've been through Meta's M1 interview process, here are key insights about what you'll actually experience.
What Surprised Candidates Most
The friendliness and genuine engagement of interviewers caught many candidates off guard. "Everyone was super friendly and seemed genuinely interested to be there," noted one candidate, which contrasts with the intimidating reputation Meta interviews often have. However, this positive atmosphere comes with a caveat. Interviewer quality can vary significantly, and some candidates experienced the opposite extreme with disengaged interviewers who were "super tired and yawning half the time and half not paying attention."
The structured nature of the evaluation process surprised several candidates. Interviewers work from specific checklists and are quite time pressured to cover all evaluation criteria within the 45 minute window. This means conversations can feel more mechanical than the casual technical discussions you might expect, with interviewers sometimes cutting off interesting tangents to ensure they hit all their required assessment points.
System design interviews showed unexpected variation in interviewer preferences and preparation levels. One candidate found their interviewer "had very very loose starting requirements and un prepared" when asked to build a music recommender, while another discovered their interviewer wasn't interested in the standard functional requirements first approach and "told me to just jump into deep dives right away." Some interviewers were particularly interested in having detailed SQL vs NoSQL debates, regardless of whether that was central to the problem being solved.
A few candidates were surprised by the minimal introductions. "Neither interviewer introduced themselves. They really just got into questions." This can feel abrupt if you're expecting more relationship building at the start of each round.
Most Effective Preparation Strategies
Candidates who succeeded emphasized the value of targeted, Meta specific preparation over generic interview prep. "HelloInterview system design practice!" was specifically called out as effective preparation, with multiple candidates noting that our guided practice and delivery framework worked well for their system design rounds.
Mock interviews proved crucial for behavioral preparation, with successful candidates using both Hello Interview's mock interview platform and "Chat GPT for mock interview for behavioral" practice. The key was rehearsing answers until they could deliver them naturally within time constraints, since time pressure was a recurring insight.
For system design specifically, practicing with Meta's actual tools made a significant difference. "Practicing system design on the excildraw board does help a lot" was a common theme, with candidates emphasizing the importance of getting comfortable with Excalidraw before the interview to avoid fumbling with the interface during technical discussions.
The most successful candidates emphasized thorough behavioral preparation over technical cramming. "Prioritizing doing a thorough retrospective on your past experience and catering the message to what Meta is looking for" proved more valuable than excessive coding practice for manager candidates. As one successful candidate noted, "As an EM, don't spend too much time prepping for the coding interview, just make sure to do a couple of basic two pointer, array and queue problems and you'll be fine."
Top Tips from Successful Candidates
Communication with your recruiter emerged as a crucial success factor that many candidates overlook. "If you have a strange experience with an interviewer, please inform your recruiter. They can be surprisingly helpful" was advice from a candidate who had to navigate a difficult interview situation. Recruiters have more power to address issues than most candidates realize.
For system design interviews, successful candidates emphasized taking control of the conversation flow. Drive the discussion yourself rather than waiting for prompts, and "Talk about trade offs while designing key components instead of waiting for the interviewer to ask questions." Spend extra time on API design upfront, as this often becomes a focal point for deeper technical discussions.
Time management proved critical across all rounds. Practice finishing coding problems within 30 minutes rather than the full 45 minute window, since you'll need buffer time for questions and discussion. For behavioral rounds, candidates who succeeded had rehearsed their stories enough to deliver them smoothly without long pauses to think.
The mindset shift from high stakes pressure to learning opportunity made a measurable difference in performance. Successful candidates found ways to reframe the experience as an interesting challenge rather than a make or break evaluation, which helped them think more clearly and communicate more naturally during the interviews.
Additional Insights
The compensation discussion often comes with surprises that candidates should prepare for mentally. Several candidates found Meta's initial offers "low end in comparison to current market & was lower than my current salary," with the main value proposition being Meta stock grants spread across four years rather than competitive base salary. Factor this into your decision making timeline if you're comparing offers.
Project retrospective rounds showed more variation than expected. While most candidates experienced deep dives into a single project, some faced "general project management questions" instead. Prepare for both scenarios by having multiple projects ready to discuss and understanding general PM principles beyond just your specific experiences.
The technical deep dive portion was often shorter than candidates anticipated. "I only needed to go into 1.5 tech deep dives. I was worried I would have to do many more!" This suggests focusing your preparation on having one or two technical projects you can discuss in extreme detail rather than trying to prepare surface level knowledge across many projects.
Coding interviews for managers showed more flexibility around syntax and implementation details than candidates expected. Interviewers were generally understanding about not remembering specific function names, especially since CoderPad doesn't provide auto completion. The focus remained on algorithmic thinking and problem solving approach rather than perfect syntax recall.
Login to track your progress
Schedule a mock interview
Meet with a FAANG senior+ engineer or manager and learn exactly what it takes to get the job.
Your account is free and you can post anonymously if you choose.